January 28, 2026 | Personal Injury

Understanding Strict Liability vs. Negligence in Personal Injury Cases
When someone is injured, one of the first legal questions is: Who is responsible? In personal injury law, responsibility usually falls into one of two categories: negligence or strict liability. These two concepts determine what an injured person must prove to recover compensation and how hard that process may be.  This article explains the difference between strict liability and negligence under Kentucky law. It also describes when each applies, how each is proven, and how a personal injury lawyer in Kentucky can help. 

What Is Negligence? 

Negligence is the most common basis for personal injury claims. It means someone failed to act with reasonable care, and that failure caused harm.  Under Kentucky law, a negligence claim requires proof of four elements: 
  • Duty of care. The defendant had a legal duty to act reasonably. 
  • Damages. The injury resulted in real losses. 
 For example, a driver has a duty to follow traffic laws. If they ran a red light and caused a crash, they likely breached that duty. 

What Is Strict Liability? 

Strict liability means a person or company can be held responsible without proving negligence. In other words, it does not matter how careful they were. If certain conditions are met, they are legally responsible for the harm.  In Kentucky, strict liability most often applies to:  
  • Defective products 
  • Abnormally dangerous activities 
  • Certain animal-related injuries 
 Strict liability typically focuses on the nature of the activity or product, rather than on a person’s conduct. 

When Does Strict Liability Apply in Kentucky? 

Some of the situations where strict liability may apply include: 

Product Liability 

Kentucky follows strict liability for defective products.  A manufacturer, distributor, or seller may be responsible if:  
  • The product was defective in design, manufacturing, or warnings. 
  • The defect existed when it left their control. 
  • The defect caused injury when the product was used in a reasonably foreseeable way. 
 The injured person does not have to prove the company was careless – only that the product was defective and caused harm. 

Abnormally Dangerous Activities 

Some activities are so inherently risky that the law imposes strict liability. Examples may include the use of explosives and certain chemical or industrial operations. If someone is injured because of such activity, the responsible party may be liable even if they followed every safety rule.  

Animal Liability 

In some situations, owners may be strictly liable for injuries caused by animals. This is particularly true when an animal is known to be dangerous. 

When Does Negligence Apply? 

Negligence applies in most other personal injury cases, including:  
  • Car and truck accidents 
  • Slip and fall accidents 
  • Medical malpractice 
  • Construction accidents 
  • Nursing home neglect 
 In these cases, the injured person must show that someone acted unreasonably under the circumstances. 

How Do You Prove Negligence? 

To prove negligence, evidence may include:  
  • Police or incident reports 
  • Photos or videos of the scene 
  • Witness statements 
  • Medical records 
  • Expert opinions 
  • Safety or maintenance records 
 The goal is to show what should have been done and how the defendant failed to do it. 

How Do You Prove Strict Liability? 

Strict liability focuses less on behavior and more on conditions.  Evidence proving strict liability may include:  
  • The defective product itself 
  • Product design or manufacturing records 
  • Recall notices 
  • Expert analysis of defects 
  • Proof that the product, animal, or activity was dangerous 
  • Proof that the product was used as expected 
 In strict liability cases, the injured person does not need to prove carelessness. They only need to prove that the product or activity caused the injury under qualifying conditions. 

Key Differences Between Negligence and Strict Liability 

The main differences between strict liability and negligence include:  
  • Negligence requires proof of careless behavior. Strict liability does not require proof of carelessness. 
  • Negligence focuses on conduct. Strict liability focuses on the activity or product. 
  • Strict liability is harder to defend but narrower in application. 
 The legal theory that applies to a case can affect:  
  • What evidence is needed 
  • How long a case may take 
  • How insurance companies defend the claim 
  • Whether liability can be shared 
 Kentucky follows a pure comparative fault system. In negligence cases, compensation may be reduced based on your percentage of fault. In strict liability cases, comparative fault may still matter, but proving negligence is not required. 

Contact Our Lexington Personal Injury Lawyers at Minner Vines Injury Lawyers, PLLC for a Free Consultation

Negligence and strict liability are two distinct grounds for holding someone responsible for an injury. Under Kentucky law, understanding which one applies can shape your entire case. If you need legal help after an injury, Minner Vines Injury Lawyers, PLLC can help. Contact our Lexington personal injury lawyers to schedule a free consultation.If you’ve been injured in an accident in Lexington or Bowling Green, please contact our car accident lawyers at Minner Vines Injury Lawyers, PLLC  for a free case evaluation.Minner Vines Injury Lawyers, PLLC – Lexington, KY Office 325 W Main St #210, Lexington, KY 40507 (859) 550-2900

  

 Minner Vines Injury Lawyers, PLLC -Bowling Green, KY Office 814 State St. suite 100, Bowling Green, KY, 42101 (270) 517-2014   Minner Vines Injury Lawyers, PLLC – Nashville Office 49 Music Square W #504, Nashville, TN 37203 (615) 676-7060